Offensive security for MSPs Australia is a topic with two sides, and both matter. Managed service providers are trusted to run the technology that other businesses depend on, which puts them in a uniquely powerful and uniquely exposed position. An MSP holds privileged access to every client it supports, so its own security posture ripples out across dozens of organisations. At the same time, MSPs are increasingly asked by those clients to provide security testing they are not always equipped to deliver themselves.
This briefing addresses both. It explains why MSPs are such attractive targets, how to secure the tooling that makes them powerful, and how an MSP can meet growing client demand for penetration testing by working with a specialist offensive security partner. It is written for Australian MSPs that want to protect themselves and strengthen what they offer their clients.
Why MSPs Are High-Value Targets
Attackers look for leverage, and an MSP offers more of it than almost any other single business. A provider supporting fifty clients holds privileged access to fifty networks, frequently through one shared set of management tools. Breach the provider, and an attacker gains a potential path into every one of those downstream organisations at once.
This is the essence of supply-chain risk. The effort required to compromise a single MSP is repaid many times over, because the access gained cascades to every client that trusts it. It is why sophisticated attackers deliberately target service providers rather than attacking each client individually, and why an MSP's security is never only its own concern. Every client inherits the consequences of the provider's posture, for better or worse.
That reality raises the bar. An MSP cannot credibly advise clients on security while leaving its own environment untested, and the systems most in need of scrutiny are exactly the ones that make the MSP valuable.
Securing RMM and Management Tooling
Remote monitoring and management platforms are the engine of a modern MSP. RMM lets a provider administer client systems remotely, deploy software and run scripts across many endpoints at once. It is essential, and it is also one of the most dangerous assets an MSP owns, precisely because it is so privileged by design.
If an attacker compromises an RMM platform or the credentials that reach it, they can potentially push malicious changes to every managed endpoint in seconds. The same efficiency that makes the tooling valuable makes a compromise catastrophic. Protecting it well is therefore fundamental:
- Enforce strong multi-factor authentication on all management tooling and administrative accounts.
- Apply least privilege, so technicians and integrations hold only the access they genuinely need.
- Separate administrative identities from everyday accounts and email.
- Monitor and log management activity so unusual actions stand out quickly.
- Keep the tooling and its supporting infrastructure patched and hardened.
These controls look straightforward on paper, but they frequently have gaps in practice. Testing whether they hold up under a determined attempt to abuse them is far more reliable than assuming they do. A penetration testing engagement focused on an MSP's own environment examines the management tooling, administrative access and client trust relationships that an attacker would target first.
Testing the Trust Relationship
The most important thing to test in an MSP is not any single system but the trust relationship itself: the path from the provider's environment into client networks. An attacker who lands inside the MSP will look for exactly this, so the security team should look for it first.
Good testing traces how a foothold in the MSP could pivot toward clients, whether through management tooling, shared credentials, remote access, or connections that were set up for convenience and never revisited. Finding and closing those paths protects the whole client base at once. Because a compromise of the MSP can cascade so widely, this internal assurance is among the highest-value investments a provider can make. A red teaming engagement can emulate a realistic supply-chain attacker for MSPs that want to see how the full chain from initial access to client impact would actually play out.
Offering Penetration Testing to Your Clients
Alongside protecting themselves, MSPs face growing demand from clients for security testing. Clients increasingly need penetration testing to satisfy their own customers, insurers, auditors and regulatory obligations, and they naturally turn to the provider they already trust. The difficulty is that offensive security is a distinct specialism, and most MSPs do not have dedicated testers in-house.
There are three ways an MSP typically responds to this demand, and only one of them serves the client well:
- Turn the work away, which sends the client looking elsewhere and weakens the relationship.
- Attempt the testing without the right expertise, which risks delivering shallow assurance that misses real issues.
- Partner with a specialist offensive security firm to deliver genuine testing while keeping the client relationship.
The third option lets an MSP meet the need properly. The provider maintains the client relationship and coordinates the engagement, while the specialist performs the testing and reporting to a professional standard. The MSP adds a valuable service, keeps its trusted advisor role, and gives the client the real expertise the work requires, all without building an offensive security team from scratch.
How a Partner Arrangement Works
A partner arrangement can be shaped to suit how an MSP prefers to work. In a collaborative model, an experienced offensive security team delivers the testing alongside the MSP, who introduces the service and manages the client through the process. Depending on the arrangement, the MSP can present the testing as part of its own offering or bring the specialist in directly, whichever fits the client relationship best.
Either way, the outcomes are the same:
- The client receives genuine, expert testing scoped to their real risks.
- The MSP strengthens the relationship by solving a need it could not fully meet alone.
- Reporting is clear enough for the client's stakeholders and technical enough to drive real fixes.
- The MSP grows its service portfolio without carrying the cost of specialist staff.
The best structure depends on the MSP's preferences and its clients' expectations, and it is worth a short conversation to find the right fit rather than forcing a one-size model.
Getting Shared Responsibility Right
A recurring source of risk in the MSP model is confusion over who is responsible for what. When each party assumes the other is covering a task, gaps appear that neither notices until an attacker does. Clear agreement on responsibilities for patching, backups, monitoring, user access and incident response is essential, and it should be written down rather than assumed.
Independent testing supports this directly. By revealing where controls are actually failing, regardless of who was meant to own them, testing turns a vague sense of shared responsibility into a concrete list of gaps to assign and close. It is far better to discover an unowned control during a planned assessment than during a live incident, and the same clarity makes any future incident response faster and less contentious.
Strengthening the Whole Chain
For MSPs, offensive security is both a duty to themselves and an opportunity with their clients. Protecting the tooling and trust relationships that make an MSP powerful defends every organisation that depends on it, while partnering to deliver genuine testing lets an MSP meet real client demand without overreaching. Both come back to the same idea: understand where you are exposed, test it honestly, and fix what you find.
If you are an MSP looking to secure your own environment or to offer specialist penetration testing to your clients, our team of expert operators can help. Explore our penetration testing services, review our red teaming capability, or get in touch to talk through a partner arrangement. You can also call StrikeCyber on 1300 654 898.
Frequently asked questions
Why are MSPs a high-value target for attackers?
A managed service provider holds privileged access to the networks of every client it supports, often through a single set of management tools. Compromising one MSP can therefore give an attacker a path into dozens or hundreds of downstream organisations at once. This supply-chain leverage makes MSPs disproportionately attractive targets, because the effort of breaching one provider is repaid many times over. It also means an MSP's own security posture directly affects the security of every client that trusts it.
What is RMM and why is it a security risk?
RMM stands for remote monitoring and management, the tooling MSPs use to administer client systems remotely, deploy software and run scripts at scale. It is essential to how MSPs operate, but it is also highly privileged by design, which makes it a prime target. If an attacker compromises an RMM platform or the credentials that access it, they can potentially push malicious changes to every managed endpoint. Securing RMM with strong authentication, tight access control and monitoring is one of the most important things an MSP can do.
How can an MSP offer penetration testing to its clients?
Many MSPs are asked by clients for penetration testing but do not have offensive security specialists in-house. Rather than turning the work away or attempting it without the right expertise, an MSP can partner with a specialist offensive security firm to deliver the testing. The MSP maintains the client relationship and coordinates the engagement, while the specialist performs the testing and reporting. This lets the MSP meet client demand, add a valuable service and keep the trusted advisor role, without building an offensive security team from scratch.
What is a white-label or partner arrangement for penetration testing?
A partner arrangement lets an MSP offer specialist penetration testing to its clients under a collaborative model, with the testing delivered by an experienced offensive security team working alongside the MSP. Depending on the arrangement, the MSP can present the service as part of its own offering or introduce the specialist directly. Either way the client gets genuine, expert testing, and the MSP strengthens its relationship by solving a need it could not fully meet alone. The right structure depends on the MSP's preferences and its clients' expectations.
What does shared responsibility mean between an MSP and its clients?
Shared responsibility means being clear about which security tasks the MSP handles and which remain with the client. Misunderstandings here are a common source of risk, where each party assumes the other is covering something and neither is. A clear agreement on responsibilities for patching, backups, monitoring, user access and incident response reduces those gaps. Independent testing helps by revealing where controls are actually failing, regardless of who was meant to own them, so responsibilities can be clarified before an attacker finds the gap.
How does penetration testing help an MSP secure itself?
Testing an MSP's own environment focuses on the systems that make it a high-value target, especially its management tooling, administrative access and the trust relationships with client networks. It shows how an attacker who breached the MSP could pivot toward clients, so the most dangerous paths can be closed first. Because a compromise of the MSP can cascade to every client, this internal testing is among the highest-value security investments a provider can make, protecting both its own business and everyone that depends on it.
