Skip to content
StrikeCyberStrikeCyber
Capability

Maturity Level Assessments

A cyber security maturity assessment measures how well your controls, policies and response capabilities stand up to real threats. StrikeCyber benchmarks you against the ASD Essential Eight, NIST CSF 2.0, ISO 27001 and CIS Controls, then delivers a gap analysis, maturity scoring and a clear roadmap.

StrikeCyber delivers cyber security maturity assessment services that measure the effectiveness, consistency and resilience of your controls against the frameworks Australian regulators and boards care about. We combine our AI-augmented offensive security platform with expert operators to benchmark where you stand, quantify the gaps and hand you a practical roadmap to close them.

From Checkbox Compliance to Measurable Security Maturity

Australian organisations are under sustained pressure to prove their cyber security is not just present but effective. Regulators, insurers and boards increasingly want evidence of measured maturity, not a folder of policies that no one has tested, and the ASD Essential Eight has become the baseline that expectation is written against.

The stakes are practical as well as reputational. Cyber insurers now price and underwrite policies against measurable control maturity, so an honest assessment directly affects your cover and premiums, while the Privacy Act reforms and SOCI Act obligations raise the bar on demonstrable, risk-based governance.

  • A maturity assessment turns vague confidence into evidence of exactly where you sit today and where you need to be.
  • Because our assessors also run live offensive engagements, our scoring reflects how controls perform under real attacker behaviour.

Our penetration testing and red teaming services pressure-test the controls a maturity assessment relies on, and our AI offensive security platform underpins the whole approach. To scope an assessment, get in touch or call 1300 654 898.

Executives reviewing security strategy in a boardroom
Maturity Assessments

Security maturity benchmarking that boards trust.

Frameworks

Security Frameworks We Assess Against

We benchmark your security maturity against the frameworks Australian regulators, insurers and boards care about, tailoring scope to your sector, size and risk appetite so every score reflects how your controls hold up in practice.

01

Essential Eight Maturity Assessment

The ASD Essential Eight has become the de facto baseline across Australian government and industry, with maturity levels ML1 to ML3 used to express expected assurance. We measure your alignment to all eight mitigation strategies and place you accurately on that scale.

Our methodology

We assess application control, patching of applications and operating systems, multi-factor authentication, restriction of administrative privileges, Microsoft Office macro configuration, user application hardening and regular, tested backups. Expert operators validate each control in practice rather than on paper, then map every gap to what is required to reach your target level.

  • ASD Essential Eight
  • ML1 to ML3
  • Patching
  • MFA
  • Backups
02

NIST CSF 2.0 Assessment

NIST released Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 with a dedicated Govern function that puts board and executive accountability at the centre of maturity. We benchmark your controls against the framework most global partners recognise.

Our methodology

We measure your ability to govern, identify, protect, detect, respond and recover, covering governance and risk management, asset, supply chain and identity management, detection and incident response readiness, and continuous monitoring. We score your current and target profiles so you can prioritise investment where it moves maturity most.

  • NIST CSF 2.0
  • Govern function
  • Current vs target
  • Supply chain
03

ISO 27001 Gap Analysis

An ISO 27001 gap analysis measures how closely your information security management system aligns to the standard and highlights what must change to be ready. It is the ideal first step before pursuing formal certification.

Our methodology

We assess security policies, risk treatment and governance, access control, data protection and cryptography, operational security and supplier management, and awareness, training and continual improvement. The output is a clear readiness picture and roadmap, not the certification audit itself, so you enter that process with no surprises.

  • ISO/IEC 27001
  • ISMS
  • Risk treatment
  • Certification readiness
04

CIS Controls Review

The CIS Critical Security Controls give you a strong, prioritised foundation for risk reduction. We benchmark your maturity against them to establish where the highest-impact improvements sit.

Our methodology

We review inventory and control of enterprise assets and software, secure configuration and continuous vulnerability management, and malware defences, logging, monitoring and incident response. Because our assessors also run live offensive engagements, we test how these controls perform under real attacker behaviour rather than accepting them at face value.

  • CIS Controls
  • Asset inventory
  • Secure configuration
  • Logging
05

Cloud Security Maturity

Cloud posture matures differently to on-premises infrastructure, and gaps here are often invisible to traditional framework reviews. We evaluate the maturity of your cloud estate across AWS, Azure and GCP.

Our methodology

We assess identity and access management and privileged access, network segmentation, encryption and data protection, and cloud logging, monitoring and response capability against provider benchmarks and best practice. Findings are grounded in evidence gathered from the environment itself, not a questionnaire.

  • AWS, Azure, GCP
  • Privileged access
  • Encryption
  • Cloud logging
06

Security Awareness & Incident Response Readiness

Resilience depends on people and process as much as technology. We assess how well your staff recognise attacks and how quickly and effectively your organisation responds when one lands.

Our methodology

We evaluate staff awareness of phishing and social engineering, the design and testing of incident response and crisis plans, and detection and response speed in simulated scenarios. Testing draws on real attacker tradecraft so readiness is measured against how incidents actually unfold.

  • Phishing awareness
  • Incident response
  • Crisis planning
  • Detection speed
AI-augmented methodology

Machine Speed, Operator Judgement

Automation covers the volume so our operators can spend their time where human judgement wins. Every result is verified by an expert before it reaches you.

Our work aligns to recognised standards including the OWASP Testing Guide and ASVS, PTES, NIST SP 800-115, OSSTMM and MITRE ATT&CK.

How the platform works
01

Continuous reconnaissance

Continuous mapping of your external attack surface, surfacing new exposures the moment they appear.

02

AI-assisted exploit chaining

Individual weaknesses connected into realistic, high-impact attack paths a real adversary would take.

03

Continuous validation

Findings reflect your live environment, not a stale snapshot, so you act on what is true today.

04

AI-accelerated reporting

Evidence turned into clear, prioritised guidance in a fraction of the usual time, every result human-verified.

How an engagement runs

A tested process, not a black box

Every StrikeCyber engagement follows the same disciplined path, so you always know where you are and what comes next.

  1. 01

    Scope & kick-off

    We agree targets, rules of engagement, timing and success criteria. No surprises, fixed scope, fixed price.

  2. 02

    Offensive testing

    AI-augmented reconnaissance and manual exploitation across your networks, applications, cloud and people.

  3. 03

    Real-time critical alerts

    Anything critical or actively exploitable is escalated the moment we find it, not weeks later in a report.

  4. 04

    Report & debrief

    A prioritised report with reproducible steps and a live debrief for your technical and executive stakeholders.

  5. 05

    Retest & validate

    Once you remediate, we retest to prove the fix holds. Typically one business day per component.

What you receive

Deliverables Built to Be Acted On

Reports engineers can execute against and boards can understand, backed by a live portal from kick-off to retest.

01

Prioritised findings

Every issue ranked by real-world risk and exploitability, not raw scanner severity, so your team fixes what matters first.

02

Reproducible evidence

Step-by-step proof and artefacts for each finding, so engineers can confirm, reproduce and remediate without guesswork.

03

Risk ratings & impact

Clear likelihood and business-impact ratings, mapped to CVE identifiers and the controls behind each weakness.

04

Remediation guidance

Practical, environment-specific fixes and hardening advice, written for your stack and your tooling.

05

Board-ready summary

An executive briefing that translates technical risk into business language for leadership and directors.

06

Live client portal

Track findings, remediation status and retests in real time, with critical issues escalated the moment we find them.

FAQ

Maturity Level Assessments FAQs

What are the ASD Essential Eight maturity levels?

The ASD Essential Eight maturity model defines four levels. Maturity Level Zero indicates significant weaknesses, while ML1, ML2 and ML3 represent increasing resistance to progressively more capable adversaries. An Essential Eight assessment places each of the eight mitigation strategies on this scale and identifies what is required to reach your target level.

What is a cyber security maturity assessment?

A cyber security maturity assessment measures how effective, consistent and resilient your security controls are, rather than simply whether they exist. It benchmarks your organisation against recognised frameworks such as the ASD Essential Eight, NIST CSF 2.0, ISO 27001 and the CIS Controls, then scores your maturity and identifies the gaps to close.

What does a NIST CSF assessment in Australia involve?

A NIST CSF assessment reviews your controls against the six functions of Cybersecurity Framework 2.0: govern, identify, protect, detect, respond and recover. We evaluate governance, risk management and technical controls, then score your current and target profiles so you can prioritise investment against the framework most global partners recognise.

How is an ISO 27001 gap analysis different from certification?

An ISO 27001 gap analysis measures how closely your information security management system aligns to the standard and highlights what must change to be ready. It is an assessment and roadmap, not the formal certification audit itself, and it is the ideal first step before pursuing certification.

How often should we run a maturity assessment?

Most Australian organisations benefit from a maturity assessment annually, or whenever there is significant change such as a major cloud migration, merger or shift in regulatory obligations. Continuous monitoring between assessments keeps your maturity view current.

Can you help us improve after the assessment, not just measure?

Yes. Beyond the gap analysis and roadmap, we offer optional implementation support and revalidation, and our offensive security services let you test that improvements genuinely raise your resilience.

Ready to take the offensive?

StrikeCyber specialises in penetration testing and red teaming engagements that deliver actionable findings. Connect with us for a free consultation.

No obligation, no sales pressure. A senior operator replies within one business day.

1300 654 898Free Consultation