Skip to content
StrikeCyberStrikeCyber
Red Teaming

Assumed Breach Testing

An efficient variant that begins from a realistic foothold, such as a compromised workstation or a set of stolen credentials, rather than starting from zero. It focuses effort on what happens after the perimeter is breached.

How it works

Inside Assumed Breach Testing

01

Start From a Realistic Foothold

Perimeters get breached. Spending an entire engagement getting in can waste budget better spent on what happens next.

Our methodology

We begin from a provided foothold, such as a compromised workstation or stolen credentials, and concentrate effort on escalation, lateral movement and reaching the objective.

  • Assumed breach
  • Efficient
  • Post-breach
02

The Sharpest Read on Internal Defence

Assumed breach gives the clearest picture of internal detection and response for organisations that accept the perimeter can fall.

Our methodology

By skipping the way in, we maximise coverage of internal controls, segmentation and monitoring, giving the sharpest read on how your environment holds up after a breach.

  • Internal defence
  • Detection
  • Coverage
03

Maximum Value Per Day

Budget is finite. Assumed breach directs it at the highest-signal part of an engagement.

Our methodology

Focusing on post-foothold activity delivers more findings that matter per engagement day than a full-scope campaign that spends days at the perimeter.

  • Cost-effective
  • Focused
  • High-signal
FAQ

Assumed Breach Testing FAQs

What is assumed breach testing?

It is an efficient red team variant that begins from a realistic foothold, such as a compromised workstation or stolen credentials, rather than starting from zero. It focuses effort on what happens after the perimeter is breached: escalation, lateral movement and reaching the objective.

Why choose assumed breach over a full red team?

Because perimeters get bypassed eventually, and assumed breach gives the sharpest read on internal detection and response without spending days getting in. It is often the most cost-effective way to test what matters most.

What foothold do you start from?

Whatever best models your risk: standard user credentials, a managed or unmanaged workstation, or a network position. We agree the starting point up front.

Is it as realistic as a full engagement?

For internal defence it is often more revealing, because more of the engagement is spent exercising the controls that contain a real intrusion.

Talk to an operator about your engagement

Scope this with a senior operator. Fixed scope, fixed price, no obligation.

No obligation, no sales pressure. A senior operator replies within one business day.

1300 654 898Free Consultation